CIP Incoterms 2020 Explained: Carriage and Insurance Paid To, Cost Split, and Risk Transfer

By SaveOnShip Editorial Team — Logistics Data Editorial Team. Last updated: 2026-08-20.

Quick answer: CIP (Carriage and Insurance Paid To) is an Incoterms 2020 rule for any transport mode — sea, air, rail, or multimodal. The seller pays export clearance, main-carriage freight to the named destination, and cargo insurance at the all-risk Institute Cargo Clauses (A) level for 110% of the contract value. But risk transfers to the buyer at the first carrier handover at origin, not at the destination. The buyer pays import duty, import taxes, and any destination charges beyond the named place. Cost and risk split at two different points — that is the single most misunderstood feature of CIP.

TL;DR: Under CIP the seller arranges and pays for shipping and insurance to your named destination, yet you carry the transit risk from the moment your goods reach the first carrier. The seller's insurance covers that risk at Clauses (A) all-risk level, but the policy is in the seller's name — you claim through it, you do not hold it. This guide covers the full cost split, the risk transfer point, the insurance obligation, CIP vs CIF / CPT / FOB / DAP / DDP, and a case study of when CIP backfires.

CIP sits inside the Incoterms 2020 family our FOB vs EXW comparison introduces; this article goes deep on the one term where "seller pays carriage and insurance" misleads buyers most often.

What does CIP mean in Incoterms 2020? (Carriage and Insurance Paid To)

CIP stands for Carriage and Insurance Paid To — one of the 11 official Incoterms 2020 rules published by the International Chamber of Commerce, and one of the two "C" rules that work for any transport mode, including air freight and multimodal container shipping (the other is CPT). The ICC's official Incoterms 2020 rules define CIP with two obligations that live on different timelines:

1. Carriage paid to a named destination — the seller contracts and pays for transport all the way to the agreed place (for example, "CIP Long Beach Container Terminal" or "CIP Chicago O'Hare").
2. Insurance paid to the same destination — the seller must buy cargo insurance covering the buyer's risk during main carriage, at a minimum of Institute Cargo Clauses (A) all-risk cover for 110% of the contract value.

What CIP does not say is that the seller bears the risk for that journey. It says the seller pays for the journey and pays for insurance on it. Risk is a separate axis, and it moves early — at origin. This is the difference that matters when cargo is damaged mid-ocean and both sides are sure the other one owns the problem.

CIP is the natural term to compare when a supplier's quote shows freight and insurance bundled: the price looks "delivered," and buyers routinely read it as "seller's problem until arrival." It is not. The sections below break down exactly who pays what, where risk actually moves, and how the insurance works in a real claim.

CIP cost and responsibility split: who pays for what

Under CIP Incoterms 2020, obligations divide as follows:

The seller pays and arranges:

• Export packing, marking, and pre-carriage to the first carrier's terminal.
• Export clearance — export declaration, licenses, and origin formalities.
• Main carriage freight to the named destination, whether that is an ocean leg, an air leg, or a multimodal combination.
• Cargo insurance to that destination, at Clauses (A) level, 110% of contract value (details in the insurance section below).

The buyer pays and arranges:

• Import clearance at destination — entry filing, import licenses, inspections. If your lane is the US, entry is typically backed by a customs bond and, for ocean freight, an ISF filing submitted before loading at origin — both buyer-side obligations under CIP.
• Import duties and taxes — the single most asked question ("CIP Incoterms who pays duty") has a clean answer: the buyer, always.
• Destination charges beyond the named place — terminal handling at destination, customs exams, storage, and on-carriage to your warehouse, unless the contract of carriage explicitly folds them into the seller's freight. Named place precision matters: "CIP Port of Long Beach" and "CIP buyer's warehouse, Reno" are very different deals.

The buyer bears risk from the first carrier handover — covered in the next section.

Approximate reference band for orientation: on a typical China–US air or ocean shipment, origin charges and export formalities often run $150–$500, main carriage from $800 (LCL ocean, per shipment, volatile) to several thousand dollars, and cargo insurance commonly 0.3%–0.6% of insured value. These figures are broad public reference bands, not quotes — shipment-specific pricing and availability always require manual confirmation with your provider.

CIP risk transfer: the point importers most often get wrong

Here is the mechanism in one sentence: risk passes from seller to buyer when the goods are handed to the first carrier engaged by the seller — the trucker or consolidator at origin — not at the port of loading, not on vessel arrival, and not at the named destination.

The asymmetry that creates disputes:

• The seller's cost obligation runs to the named destination (Long Beach, Chicago).
• The seller's risk ends at the first handover (for example, a container yard in Shenzhen).
• The buyer's risk runs from that Shenzhen handover onward — across the ocean, through destination handling — while the buyer's cost obligations only start at import clearance.

So when a container is damaged by rough handling at the transshipment port, the loss belongs to the buyer. The seller did nothing wrong; the freight was paid as agreed. The buyer's remedy is not the seller — it is the insurance the seller was obliged to buy, which is why the next section matters more than any other.

A useful mental model: under CIP, the seller is your paying agent, not your risk bearer. They buy freight and insurance on your behalf because they are better placed to contract at origin; ownership of the journey's risk is still yours. If that risk allocation feels wrong for your shipment, the correct move is to renegotiate the term (DAP or DDP shift destination-side obligations to the seller — see our DDP shipping guide for the other extreme), not to misread CIP.

How much insurance must the seller buy under CIP?

Incoterms 2020 upgraded CIP's insurance floor. The rule now requires:

• Institute Cargo Clauses (A) cover — the broad "all risks" level, subject to listed exclusions such as improper packing, inherent vice, delay, and insolvency of the carrier. (This is a higher bar than CIF, which still defaults to the minimal Clauses (C) named-perils cover.)
• Insured value of at least 110% of the contract price, the extra 10% representing the buyer's expected profit.
• Cover running, at minimum, from the first-carrier risk transfer point to the named destination — matching the segment where the buyer bears risk.
• The seller must provide the buyer the insurance policy or certificate so the buyer (or any party with insurable interest) can claim.

Two practical consequences buyers miss. First, "all risks" is not "everything": an excluded cause — say, delay-driven spoilage — is uninsured no matter which clause applies. Second, the claimant mechanics are awkward. The policy is procured by the seller; the buyer claims under it. In a real claim you need the certificate, the claims agent named in it, and the survey reports — documents your team does not hold unless you asked before shipment.

This is why experienced importers treat the seller's CIP insurance as a floor, not a ceiling: verify the certificate before departure, and top up with your own cargo policy when the goods are high-value, fragile, or on a lane with known handling problems. Our cargo insurance guide covers coverage types and what a dedicated policy adds. As an approximate reference band, standalone all-risk cargo insurance commonly costs 0.3%–0.6% of cargo value per shipment — orientation only, with actual premiums requiring manual confirmation from an insurer.

CIP vs CIF, CPT, FOB, DAP, and DDP

The comparison questions dominate the PAA box, so here is each answer in one place:

• CIP vs CIF. Same "seller pays carriage + insurance" shape, three differences: (1) CIF is sea-only; CIP works for any mode, including air. (2) CIF insurance defaults to minimal Clauses (C); CIP requires all-risk Clauses (A). (3) Under CIF, risk transfers when goods are loaded on board the vessel; under CIP, at the first carrier handover — which can be days earlier and inland. For containerized freight, CIP is generally the better-fitting term; CIF was designed for breakbulk cargo walked up the ship's rail.
• CIP vs CPT. Identical except insurance: CPT obliges the seller to pay carriage but no insurance at all. If your quote says CPT and you assumed cover existed, you have none — buy your own.
• CIP vs FOB. Under FOB the buyer contracts and pays main carriage and risk transfers on board the vessel; the seller's job ends at loading. CIP keeps both carriage procurement and insurance with the seller. FOB suits buyers with their own freight contracts; CIP suits buyers who want origin-side logistics handled for them.
• CIP vs DAP ("which is better"). DAP extends the seller's carriage obligation to a named place ready for unloading and — critically — risk travels with the goods to that place; insurance is the seller's commercial choice, not a rule. Neither term includes import duty (buyer's). DAP is "better" when you want risk aligned with delivery; CIP is "better" when you want the seller's buying power on freight plus mandated insurance, and you accept origin-side risk transfer.
• CIP vs DDP ("is CIP the same as DDP"). Almost opposites. Under DDP the seller also pays import duty and taxes and delivers at destination; under CIP the buyer always pays import charges and carries transit risk. If a quote says CIP, no part of your US duty bill is covered.

For a fuller side-by-side of the cost/risk split across terms, see our Incoterms comparison series.

When CIP works well — and when it backfires (case study)

A composite case from trade-logistics practice shows both edges of the term. A US importer bought 2 pallets of precision sensors, 780 kg, value $48,000, from a Shenzhen supplier on CIP Los Angeles International Airport terms. The supplier booked the air leg, bought a Clauses (A) policy for $52,800 (110%), and handed the pallets to a consolidator in Shenzhen. At a transit hub, a forklift punctured one crate; damage came to $6,100.

What went right: because CIP mandated all-risk cover and the certificate named a claims agent in Los Angeles, the importer filed with the survey report and recovered the repair cost — a claim that would have failed under CPT (no insurance) and likely under CIF (minimal cover, sea-only anyway). What went wrong: the importer had assumed "CIP Los Angeles" meant the supplier owned the problem and spent the first week emailing the supplier instead of the claims agent named on the certificate — burning time against the policy's prompt-notice condition. The lesson buyers should keep: under CIP your protection is a document, not a counterparty. Get the insurance certificate before departure, read the claims-agent clause, and know your notice deadlines.

CIP works well when the seller has strong origin-side freight contracts (common for established Chinese exporters), when you want mandated all-risk cover, and when your own team is set up to run import clearance — bond, entry, duties — at destination. It backfires when the buyer reads "carriage and insurance paid" as "risk-free until arrival," when nobody collects the insurance certificate, or when the named destination is written loosely ("CIP USA") and destination charges turn into a dispute.

If you are still mapping providers and routes before negotiating terms, SaveOnShip's logistics company profiles and country route pages show which providers operate on your lane and the reference price bands for each mode — useful context before you decide whether seller-arranged CIP freight or your own FOB contract prices better.

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between CIP and CIF?

CIF is sea-only and only obliges minimal Clauses (C) insurance, with risk transferring when goods are loaded on board the vessel. CIP works for any transport mode including air, requires all-risk Clauses (A) insurance, and transfers risk earlier — at the first carrier handover, often an inland origin terminal. For containerized or air freight, CIP is usually the better-fitting term.

What is the difference between CIP and FOB?

Under FOB the buyer contracts and pays the main carriage, and risk transfers when the goods are loaded on board at origin; the seller arranges nothing beyond the port. Under CIP the seller contracts and pays main carriage plus all-risk insurance to the named destination, while risk still passes to the buyer at the first carrier handover. FOB gives the buyer freight control; CIP gives the seller freight procurement with mandated insurance.

Which is better, CIP or DAP?

Neither is universally better — they allocate risk differently. Under DAP the seller bears risk all the way to the named destination ready for unloading but owes no insurance; under CIP the seller owes all-risk insurance but risk passes to the buyer at origin. Choose DAP when you want risk aligned with physical delivery; choose CIP when you want the seller's freight rates plus mandated insurance and can manage origin-side risk.

Is CIP the same as DDP?

No — nearly opposite. Under CIP the buyer always pays import duty and taxes and bears transit risk from the first carrier handover. Under DDP the seller pays import duty and taxes and delivers at the destination with risk traveling to that point. The only similarity is that the seller arranges the main carriage in both.

Who pays import duty under CIP Incoterms?

The buyer, in every case. CIP's "carriage and insurance paid" covers export clearance, main-carriage freight, and cargo insurance only — import clearance, duties, and destination taxes are always the buyer's responsibility, which is why "CIP Incoterms who pays duty" has the same answer as CPT or CIF.

> Disclaimer: SaveOnShip is a logistics route lookup and comparison platform — not a freight forwarder, carrier, customs broker, insurer, or booking service. Incoterms explanations, insurance descriptions, and all prices and cost bands in this article are approximate references compiled from public sources for orientation only; they are not quotes, insurance advice, or legal advice. Shipment-specific freight pricing, insurance coverage, and availability require manual confirmation with your provider or insurer, and contract terms should be reviewed against the official Incoterms 2020 text.

Comparing providers and reference price bands on your lane? Explore [country routes on SaveOnShip](https://saveonship.com/countries), check our [data methodology](https://saveonship.com/data-information), or [get in touch](https://saveonship.com/contact).